![]() Grab demos where you can and see what you think, your tastes (and ears) will likely be different than mine. I also use, when I can, the Studer A-800 on most of my tracks, and the ATR-102 on the master, and that does something pretty cool, some of the time anyway.Īs a guess, all of the mentioned vendors to a pretty good job, and there probably isn't one that is better or worse, they are just different at this point. I can control the UA Console application, and any plugins inserted there too, which is nice for tracking.īut what is missing - to me - is a really good plugin to provide whatever magic it is that a good 2-mix summing stage provides. Also, to avoid discontinuities in the differential impedance, the distance between the differential LVDS signals should remain constant ov er the entire length of the traces. I can substitute a bunch of UA plugins for the Softube plugins in Console 1, which is nice. To ensure minimal reflections and maintain th e receiver’s common mode noise rejection, run the differential traces as closely as possible after they leave the driving IC. ![]() It too sounds great, and I really like the control surface. I like both! Brainworx has talked a lot about their ability to make minor variations, but I'm not hearing the effect, so I haven't invested yet (probably the only Brainworx stuff I don't own!) I've focused on the UAD and Brainworx channel strips.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |